By James Craig Green
Cafe Hayek posted the following article about the Obamacare debacle - especially the President's deceitful handling of it - on November 15, 2013:
11-15-2013 CAFE HAYEK Article
I especially liked the question by Major Garett, followed by Obama's long-winded non-response:
GARETT'S QUESTION:
Q: Thank you, Mr. President. You say, while the law was being debated, if you
like your plan you can keep it. You said, after the law was implemented or
signed, if you like your plan you can keep it. Americans believed you, sir, when
you said that to them over and over.
Do you not believe, sir, the American people deserve a deeper, more
transparent accountability from you as to why you said that over and over when
your own statistics published in the Federal Register alerted your policy staff
— and, I presume, you — to the fact that millions of Americans would in fact
probably fall into the very gap you’re trying to administratively fix now?
That’s one question.
OBAMA'S RESPONSE:
With respect to the pledge I made that if you like your plan you can keep it,
I think — you know, and I’ve said in interviews — that there is no doubt that
the way I put that forward unequivocally ended up not being accurate. It was not
because of my intention not to deliver on that commitment and that promise. We
put a grandfather clause into the law but it was insufficient.
Keep in mind that the individual market accounts for 5 percent of the
population. So when I said you can keep your health care, you know, I’m looking
at folks who’ve got employer-based health care. I’m looking at folks who’ve got
Medicare and Medicaid. And that accounts for the vast majority of Americans. And
then for people who don’t have any health insurance at all, obviously that
didn’t apply. My commitment to them was you were going to be able to get
affordable health care for the first time.
You have an individual market that accounts for about 5 percent of the
population. And our working assumption was — my working assumption was that the
majority of those folks would find better policies at lower cost or the same
cost in the marketplaces and that there — the universe of folks who potentially
would not find a better deal in the marketplaces, the grandfather clause would
work sufficiently for them. And it didn’t. And again, that’s on us, which is why
we’re — that’s on me.
And that’s why I’m trying to fix it. And as I said earlier, my — I guess last
week, and I will repeat, that’s something I deeply regret because it’s scary
getting a cancelation notice.
Now, it is important to understand that out of that population, typically,
there is constant churn in that market. You know, this market is not very stable
and reliable for people. So people have a lot of complaints when they’re in that
marketplace. As long as you’re healthy, things seem to be going pretty good. And
so a lot of people think, I’ve got pretty good insurance, until they get sick,
and then suddenly they look at the fine print and they’ve got a $50,000 out-of-
pocket expense that they can’t pay.
We know that on average over the last decade, each year premiums in that
individual market would go up an average of 15 percent a year. I know that
because when we were talking about health care reform, one of the complaints
was, I bought health care in the individual market, and I just got a notice from
the insurer they dropped me after I had an illness or my premiums skyrocketed by
20 or 30 percent; why aren’t we doing something about this?
So part of what our goal has been is to make sure that that individual market
is stable and fair and has the kind of consumer protections that make sure that
people don’t get a rude surprise when they really need health insurance.
But if you just got a cancelation notice and so far you’re thinking, my
prices are pretty good, you haven’t been sick, and it fits your budget, and now
you get this notice, you’re going to be worried about it. And if the insurer is
saying the reason you’re getting this notice is because of the Affordable Care
Act, then you’re going to be understandably aggravated about it.
Now, for a big portion of those people, the truth is, they might have gotten
a notice saying, we’re jacking up your rates by 30 percent. They might have
said, from here on out we’re not going to cover X, Y and Z illnesses. We’re
changing the — because these were all 12- month policies. They — the insurance
companies were no — under no obligation to renew the exact same policies that
you had before.
But look, one of the things I understood when we decided to reform the — the
health insurance market, part of the reason why it hasn’t been done before and
it’s very difficult to do, is that anything that’s going on that’s tough in — in
the health care market, if you initiated a reform, can be attributed to your
law. And — and so what we want to do is to be able to say to these folks, you
know what, the Affordable Care Act is not going to be the reason why insurers
have to cancel your plan. Now, what folks may find is the insurance companies
may still come back and say, we want to charge you 20 percent more than we did
last year, or we’re not going to cover prescription drugs now. But that will —
that’s in the nature of the market that existed earlier.
Craig Green's blog discusses history, philosophy and economics from a free market perspective. See Craig's bio, premises, archives and links in the right column. From 2011, April's "Unchain the Builders" series begins with "Unchain The Builders 1," each linked to the other articles. March's "Subordinate Acts" is Craig's article on the U.S. Constitution. Also see March's LIFEPOWER articles from the 1990's. Anyone can comment without subscription, but leave email if you want to keep abreast.
Saturday, November 16, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment